Comments for Web Hosting Directory

Comment on 150 Web Hosting Resources by Togrul

Togrul — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:07:22 +0000

Hey,

this is really a great post with lots of valuable and comprehensive info. I’ll surely add it to my bookmark list.

Thank you very much,
Togrul

Comment on 150 Web Hosting Resources by Kunnu Singh

Kunnu Singh — Fri, 28 May 2010 07:52:44 +0000

hi,

please add our Hosting company in your site, PR3 – http://dewlance.com

please add my site, partnership opportunities?

Comment on How Google Kills and Misses Out by Tess Elliott

Tess Elliott — Mon, 24 May 2010 01:31:51 +0000

Had to read your article when I Stumbled Upon it because I found Google Buzz appalling. StumbleUpon, for anyone over around 20 can also be trying with an abundance of witless, childish cartoons, scantily clad girls with a few naked ones pretending to be art/fashion/photography, jarring sites that blast heavy metal the second the page loads with no warning, and various other kinds of silliness. But on the positive side: good science and political coverage, great photographs, and–okay–lots of cute baby animals. But everything I have seen on Buzz has been for horny teens or micro rants. Google needs to play well with others.

Comment on Why Free Hosting Isn’t Right for You by Tweets that mention Why Free Hosting Isn’t Right for You -- Topsy.com

Tweets that mention Why Free Hosting Isn’t Right for You -- Topsy.com — Thu, 13 May 2010 11:28:19 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brroha, The Path Central, Ian Campbell, Jeff A. Jones, Rms Gvo and others. Rms Gvo said: Why Free Hosting Isn't Right for You: Whether you're about to launch a new website or it's time to renew the hosti… http://bit.ly/dswnTp [...]

Comment on How Google Kills and Misses Out by Helena C

Helena C — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:51:26 +0000

You missed out on Echoecho, the only permission based location finder.

Comment on Does Your Website Need a Directory Tree by g1smd

g1smd — Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:48:41 +0000

@netpaths

I can only assume that you completely missed my earlier post above.

Comment on Does Your Website Need a Directory Tree by Sam

Sam — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:01:44 +0000

@netpaths – You have quoted a very good example but as Michael said, Every situation is different.

Comment on Does Your Website Need a Directory Tree by netpaths

netpaths — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:28:43 +0000

I would recommend using a directory structure over a single filename with a long string of hyphens.

With this URL and how easy it is to understand what you will find when clicking on it, and it forces a set taxonomy for each similar category:
http://www.dmoz.org/Recreation/Autos/Makes_and_Models/Ford/Mustang/

Now consider this URL: it is very inflexible and can be arbitrarily setup depending on the individual author.
http://www.dmoz.org/Recreation-Autos-Makes-Models-Ford-Mustang/

Comment on Does Your Website Need a Directory Tree by Michael

Michael — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:30:23 +0000

You can have a product reachable under multiple paths but still have the simple URL. The breadcrumb can only go one way, but it helps with URL structure

Comment on Does Your Website Need a Directory Tree by Robert

Robert — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:55:49 +0000

Personally I prefer to use a directory tree. But that’s just me. This makes it easier to generate breadcrumbs as well as use address bar navigation (simply remove the last directory and you move up to the larger holding category).

If you’ve set the site correctly, you shouldn’t have to worry too much about the page cannon.

Just my preference. But hey, what works with somethings doesn’t work for all.